University of Taipei:Item 987654321/1841
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 2471/17084 (14%)
造访人次 : 3195067      在线人数 : 947
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://utaipeir.lib.utaipei.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/1841


    题名: 積極義務與消極義務:台美大學生道德判斷的文化比較研究
    Positive Duties and Negative Duties: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Moral Judgement between Taiwanese and American College Students
    作者: 危芷芬
    黃光國
    贡献者: 臺北市立教育大學心理與諮商學系
    关键词: 道德判斷
    關係取向
    積極義務
    消極義務
    庶人倫理
    後俗規道德
    Moral judgements
    Relationship orientation
    Positive duties
    Negative duties
    Ethics of ordinary people
    Post conventional morality
    日期: 1998
    上传时间: 2009-07-13 15:07:06 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 中文摘要
         本研究的主要目的,是要從臺灣與美國大學生對於「實踐義務」和「違反道德」
    兩類問題的反應,突顯出儒家思想倫理觀與 Kohlberg 之「後俗規道德」的差異。西方個人
    主義的倫理觀認為:個人到了道德發展的最高階段,應當會採取普遍的正義原則。儒家倫理
    觀所提倡的「庶人倫理」,在「程序正義」方面強調「尊尊原則」;在「分配正義」方面強
    調是「親親原則」。當親人的作為違反「不作為」的「消極義務」時,個人應當盡力加以維
    護。本研究的結果顯示:臺灣大學生和美國大學生在判斷自己對他人所應踐行的「積極義務
    」時,同樣都認為:對待與自己較為親近的父母、配偶、子女和家人應當採取義務奉獻的原
    則;相反地,對於與自己較疏遠的朋友、同事、陌生人和競爭者,則適用公平對待的原則。
    兩群體之間,只有量的差異。但是在判斷違反道德的行為時,臺灣大學生和美國大學生的反
    應卻有明顯的差異:當道德判斷涉及未盡到對家人的「積極義務」時,兩組大學生都會考慮
    行為者與自己的關係,而作出錯誤程度不等的評分。但是就違反「消極義務」,即侵犯他人
    權利的行為而言,美國大學生並不會因為行為者與自己的關係而影響到對該行為之錯誤程度
    的評定;相反地,臺灣大學生在判斷侵犯個人權利的行為時,卻會考慮行為者與自己的關係
    親疏遠近,而作出不同的判斷。


    英文摘要
         The major purpose of this study is to distinguish the distinctive
    features between Confucian ethics of ordinary people and Kohlberg's
    post-conventional morality. The study compared American and Taiwanese college
    students' responses to items about practicing positive duties to others and
    judging the immorality of violating the negative duties done by others. The
    results indicated that both groups were obligated in a descending order to
    assume positive duties to their parents, spouse, children, and relatives. They
    also believed that the equity rule should be applied to friends, colleagues,
    strangers, and competitors. On these two dimensions, the two cultural groups
    were different in extent only. However, when judging the wrongness of not
    assuming positive duties to family members done by other, Taiwanese students
    tended to take the relationships between the actor and the judge into account.
    In case of evaluating others' misbehaviors of violating negative duties,
    Taiwanese students were much influenced by his interpersonal relationships with
    the actor, while American students were not.
    關聯: 中華心理學刊, 40:2, p.137-153
    显示于类别:[心理與諮商學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在uTaipei中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    如有問題歡迎與系統管理員聯繫
    02-23113040轉2132
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈