English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 3313/17059 (19%)
造訪人次 : 1035873      線上人數 : 500
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://utaipeir.lib.utaipei.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/2187


    題名: 漢代匈奴種族問題
    作者: 耿振華
    貢獻者: 臺北市立教育大學歷史與地理學系
    關鍵詞: 匈奴
    漢代
    種族
    日期: 1991
    上傳時間: 2009-07-20 15:10:25 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 中文摘要
         匈奴是最早見於中國正史系統記載的外族,它的人種問題,一直存在著
    爭議。然而只要釐清匈奴帝國封建部落中「匈奴別種」與匈奴單于族「攣鞮氏」(或
    稱虛連題氏)種屬間的二者差異,匈奴人種問題便可以在時空範圍內加以固定,漢
    代匈奴種族問題亦得以迎刃而解。
    雖則匈奴帝國的部落封建型態,及其對外族進行劫掠時的麻雜寰事組織,都易造
    成氏族與氏族之間的血統融合。但就單于王位繼承方式「必立宗種」的嚴格規制
    及單于婚姻制度的封閉性質來看,匈奴單于氏族的種屬問題,是可以由文獻、考
    古、語言和風俗習慣得到正確合理的估測。
    本文分列四章:
    第一章前言。說明匈奴時空範圍的界定及輔助學科的運用,有助於研究種屬問題。
    第二章匈奴先世及其後代族屬的資料考訂。則排比史料,說明文獻傳說中以為匈
    奴出於漢族乃係出於人名與族名的混稱;而經由語言學對音方式的分析,匈奴單于
    王族應屬於阿爾泰系語族,與匈奴帝國其他部落的人種不一定相同。
    第三章匈奴本部族屬的種族封閉性及其與異種部落問的聯繫關係。則就匈奴單于
    王位繼承制度及單于族婚姻制度的血緣封閉性,說明匈奴攣鞮氏族的種屬純粹
    性。
    第四章結語:漢代匈奴種屬及其崛起過程與消散原因的再探討。釐清匈奴帝國的封
    建部落種屬與匈奴單于王室血統的差異,並以考古人骨分析資料證明漢代匈奴為
    阿爾泰系語族的蒙古大人種,在人種及語言方面較接近後世的突厥族。


    英文摘要
         There has been existed in controversies about Hsiung-Nu tribes which wasthe
    earliest foreign race written in Chinese official histories. It is neededto make it clear that
    the Hsiung-Nu tribes were different from Chan-yu raceamong the other aboriginal feudal
    tribes. We are also have to orientate their activity territories and time periods in order to
    resolve the complex problemsabout Hsiung-Nu empire during Han Dynasty.
    Hsiung-Nu tribes were used to invade the foreign people by armed forces,but then
    blended with one another for their posterity in result. Ve found Chanyu tribes had a
    severe marriage system and the succession of kinghood waslimited to the same clan.
    From the studies of their language, custom, documentsand archaeology, it is not so
    difficult to get a reasonable judgement to thebelongingness of Chan-yu tribes.
    Four parts of this paper are listed as below:
    1.Foreword--limit the sphere of this study and the concerned subjects used as aids.
    2.Verification--Hsiung-Nu tribes would be a branch of Altaic people, and were different
    from other tribes in its empire.
    3.Specificity--Closed custom and marriage restriction as well as the limited succession of
    kinghood maintained its race purity.
    4.Conclusion--Clarify the origin of Hsiung-Nu tribes were belonging to Mongol race,
    nearer to Turkish people in the age afterwards.
    關聯: 臺北市立師範學院學報, 22, p.239-254
    顯示於類別:[歷史與地理學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在uTaipei中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    如有問題歡迎與系統管理員聯繫
    02-23113040轉2132
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋